| CVE |
Vendors |
Products |
Updated |
CVSS v3.1 |
| Cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in OpenEdit Digital Asset Management (DAM) before 5.2014 allows remote attackers to perform unspecified actions as arbitrary users via unknown vectors. |
| Cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in the Special:Import feature in MediaWiki 1.3.0 through 1.6.10, 1.12.x before 1.12.2, and 1.13.x before 1.13.3 allows remote attackers to perform unspecified actions as authenticated users via unknown vectors. |
| Open redirect vulnerability in Simplenews Statistics 6.x before 6.x-2.0, a module for Drupal, allows remote attackers to redirect users to arbitrary web sites and conduct phishing attacks via unspecified vectors. |
| Multiple cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerabilities in the web management interface in the ZyXEL P-330W router allow remote attackers to hijack the authentication of administrators for requests that (1) enable remote router management via goform/formRmtMgt or (2) modify the administrator password via goform/formPasswordSetup. |
| Cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in PhpShop 0.8.1 allows remote attackers to hijack the authentication of arbitrary users for requests that invoke the cartAdd function in a shop/cart action to the default URI. |
| Cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in IBM Workplace for Business Controls and Reporting 2.x and IBM Workplace Web Content Management 6.x has unknown impact and remote attack vectors. NOTE: some of these details are obtained from third party information. |
| Cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in the FAQ Ask module 5.x and 6.x before 6.x-2.0, a module for Drupal, allows remote attackers to hijack the authentication of arbitrary users for requests that access unpublished content. |
| Ruby on Rails 2.1 before 2.1.3 and 2.2.x before 2.2.2 does not verify tokens for requests with certain content types, which allows remote attackers to bypass cross-site request forgery (CSRF) protection for requests to applications that rely on this protection, as demonstrated using text/plain. |
| Multiple cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerabilities in TangoCMS before 2.2.0 allow remote attackers to hijack the authentication of administrators. |
| Cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in page 34 in MODx CMS 0.9.6.1 and 0.9.6.1p1 allows remote attackers to hijack the authentication of other users for requests that modify passwords via manager/index.php. NOTE: due to the lack of details, it is not clear whether this is related to CVE-2008-5941. |
| Multiple cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerabilities on the Cisco Linksys WAG54GS Wireless-G ADSL Gateway with 1.01.03 and earlier firmware allow remote attackers to perform actions as administrators via an arbitrary valid request to an administrative URI, as demonstrated by (1) a Restore Factory Defaults action using the mtenRestore parameter to setup.cgi and (2) creation of a user account using the sysname parameter to setup.cgi. |
| Multiple cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerabilities in AgoraCart 5.2.005 and 5.2.006 and AgoraCart GOLD 5.5.005 allow remote attackers to hijack the authentication of administrators for requests that (1) modify a .htaccess file via an unspecified request to protected/manager.cgi or (2) change the password of an administrative account. |
| Cross-site scripting (XSS) vulnerability in wp-newblog.php in WordPress multi-user (MU) 1.0 and earlier allows remote attackers to inject arbitrary web script or HTML via the weblog_id parameter (Username field). |
| The AutoCatSet plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery in all versions up to, and including, 2.1.4. This is due to missing or incorrect nonce validation on the autocatset_ajax function. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to trigger automatic recategorization of posts via a forged request granted they can trick a site administrator into performing an action such as clicking on a link. |
| The Comment Info Detector plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery in all versions up to, and including, 1.0.5. This is due to missing nonce validation on the options.php file when handling form submissions. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to modify plugin settings via a forged request granted they can trick a site administrator into performing an action such as clicking on a link. |
| The Disable Content Editor For Specific Template plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery in all versions up to, and including, 2.0. This is due to missing nonce validation on template configuration updates. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to add or delete template configurations via a forged request granted they can trick an administrator into performing an action such as clicking on a link. |
| Cross-Site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in joshuae1974 Flash Video Player allows Cross Site Request Forgery.This issue affects Flash Video Player: from n/a through 5.0.4. |
| The WP Posts Re-order plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery in all versions up to, and including, 1.0. This is due to missing nonce validation on the `cpt_plugin_options()` function. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to update the plugin settings including capability, autosort, and adminsort settings, via a forged request granted they can trick a site administrator into performing an action such as clicking on a link. |
| The Add Google Social Profiles to Knowledge Graph Box plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery in all versions up to, and including, 1.0. This is due to missing nonce validation on the settings update functionality. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to update the plugin's Knowledge Graph settings via a forged request granted they can trick a site administrator into performing an action such as clicking on a link. |
| The SR WP Minify HTML plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery in all versions up to, and including, 2.1. This is due to missing nonce validation on the sr_minify_html_theme() function. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to update plugin settings via a forged request granted they can trick a site administrator into performing an action such as clicking on a link. |
