Export limit exceeded: 357805 CVEs match your query. Please refine your search to export 10,000 CVEs or fewer.
Search
Search Results (6783 CVEs found)
| CVE | Vendors | Products | Updated | CVSS v3.1 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CVE-2026-5739 | 1 Powerjob | 1 Powerjob | 2026-04-08 | 7.3 High |
| A security flaw has been discovered in PowerJob 5.1.0/5.1.1/5.1.2. The affected element is the function GroovyEvaluator.evaluate of the file /openApi/addWorkflowNode of the component OpenAPI Endpoint. The manipulation of the argument nodeParams results in code injection. The attack can be executed remotely. The project was informed of the problem early through an issue report but has not responded yet. | ||||
| CVE-2026-33654 | 2 Hkuds, Nanobot | 2 Nanobot, Nanobot | 2026-04-08 | 9.8 Critical |
| nanobot is a personal AI assistant. Prior to version 0.1.6, an indirect prompt injection vulnerability exists in the email channel processing module (`nanobot/channels/email.py`), allowing a remote, unauthenticated attacker to execute arbitrary LLM instructions (and subsequently, system tools) without any interaction from the bot owner. By sending an email containing malicious prompts to the bot's monitored email address, the bot automatically polls, ingests, and processes the email content as highly trusted input, fully bypassing channel isolation and resulting in a stealthy, zero-click attack. Version 0.1.6 patches the issue. | ||||
| CVE-2026-33881 | 2 Windmill, Windmill-labs | 2 Windmill, Windmill | 2026-04-08 | 7.2 High |
| Windmill is an open-source developer platform for internal code: APIs, background jobs, workflows and UIs. Workspace environment variable values are interpolated into JavaScript string literals without escaping single quotes in the NativeTS executor. A workspace admin who sets a custom environment variable with a value containing `'` can inject arbitrary JavaScript that executes inside every NativeTS script in that workspace. This is a code injection bug in `worker.rs`, not related to the sandbox/NSJAIL topic. Version 1.664.0 patches the issue. | ||||
| CVE-2026-30305 | 2 Orangecat, Syntx | 2 Syntx, Command Auto Approval Module | 2026-04-08 | 9.8 Critical |
| Syntx's command auto-approval module contains a critical OS command injection vulnerability that renders its whitelist security mechanism completely ineffective. The system relies on fragile regular expressions to parse command structures; while it attempts to intercept dangerous operations, it fails to account for standard Shell command substitution syntax (specifically $(...)and backticks ...). An attacker can construct a command such as git log --grep="$(malicious_command)", forcing Syntx to misidentify it as a safe git operation and automatically approve it. The underlying Shell prioritizes the execution of the malicious code injected within the arguments, resulting in Remote Code Execution without any user interaction. | ||||
| CVE-2026-30306 | 2 Rahmanazhar, Sakadev | 2 Sakadev, Saka-dev | 2026-04-08 | 9.8 Critical |
| In its design for automatic terminal command execution, SakaDev offers two options: Execute safe commands and execute all commands. The description for the former states that commands determined by the model to be safe will be automatically executed, whereas if the model judges a command to be potentially destructive, it still requires user approval. However, this design is highly susceptible to prompt injection attacks. An attacker can employ a generic template to wrap any malicious command and mislead the model into misclassifying it as a 'safe' command, thereby bypassing the user approval requirement and resulting in arbitrary command execution. | ||||
| CVE-2026-30308 | 2 Presidio, Presidio-oss | 2 Hai Build, Hai Build | 2026-04-08 | 9.8 Critical |
| In its design for automatic terminal command execution, HAI Build Code Generator offers two options: Execute safe commands and Execute all commands. The description for the former states that commands determined by the model to be safe will be automatically executed, whereas if the model judges a command to be potentially destructive, it still requires user approval. However, this design is highly susceptible to prompt injection attacks. An attacker can employ a generic template to wrap any malicious command and mislead the model into misclassifying it as a 'safe' command, thereby bypassing the user approval requirement and resulting in arbitrary command execution. | ||||
| CVE-2026-30313 | 2 Cline, Necboy | 2 Cline, Cline-dsai | 2026-04-08 | 9.8 Critical |
| DSAI-Cline's command auto-approval module contains a critical OS command injection vulnerability that renders its whitelist security mechanism completely ineffective. The system relies on string-based parsing to validate commands; while it intercepts dangerous operators such as ;, &&, ||, |, and command substitution patterns, it fails to account for raw newline characters embedded within the input. An attacker can construct a payload by embedding a literal newline between a whitelisted command and malicious code (e.g., git log malicious_command), forcing DSAI-Cline to misidentify it as a safe operation and automatically approve it. The underlying PowerShell interpreter treats the newline as a command separator, executing both commands sequentially, resulting in Remote Code Execution without any user interaction. | ||||
| CVE-2026-34200 | 1 Nhost | 2 Cli, Nhost | 2026-04-08 | 7.5 High |
| Nhost is an open source Firebase alternative with GraphQL. Prior to version 1.41.0, The Nhost CLI MCP server, when explicitly configured to listen on a network port, applies no inbound authentication and does not enforce strict CORS. This allows a malicious website visited on the same machine to issue cross-origin requests to the MCP server and invoke privileged tools using the developer's locally configured credentials. This vulnerability requires two explicit, non-default configuration steps to be exploitable. The default nhost mcp start configuration is not affected. This issue has been patched in version 1.41.0. | ||||
| CVE-2026-34202 | 2 Zcashfoundation, Zfnd | 4 Zebra, Zebra-chain, Zebra and 1 more | 2026-04-08 | 7.5 High |
| ZEBRA is a Zcash node written entirely in Rust. Prior to zebrad version 4.3.0 and zebra-chain version 6.0.1, a vulnerability in Zebra's transaction processing logic allows a remote, unauthenticated attacker to cause a Zebra node to panic (crash). This is triggered by sending a specially crafted V5 transaction that passes initial deserialization but fails during transaction ID calculation. This issue has been patched in zebrad version 4.3.0 and zebra-chain version 6.0.1. | ||||
| CVE-2026-35093 | 3 Fedoraproject, Freedesktop, Redhat | 3 Fedora, Libinput, Enterprise Linux | 2026-04-08 | 8.8 High |
| A flaw was found in libinput. A local attacker who can place a specially crafted Lua bytecode file in certain system or user configuration directories can bypass security restrictions. This allows the attacker to run unauthorized code with the same permissions as the program using libinput, such as a graphical compositor. This could lead to the attacker monitoring keyboard input and sending that information to an external location. | ||||
| CVE-2026-5332 | 1 Xiaopi | 1 Panel | 2026-04-08 | 3.5 Low |
| A vulnerability was identified in Xiaopi Panel 1.0.0. This vulnerability affects unknown code of the file /demo.php of the component WAF Firewall. The manipulation of the argument param leads to cross site scripting. Remote exploitation of the attack is possible. The exploit is publicly available and might be used. The vendor was contacted early about this disclosure but did not respond in any way. | ||||
| CVE-2026-33533 | 1 Nicolargo | 1 Glances | 2026-04-08 | 6.5 Medium |
| Glances is an open-source system cross-platform monitoring tool. Prior to version 4.5.3, the Glances XML-RPC server (activated with glances -s or glances --server) sends Access-Control-Allow-Origin: * on every HTTP response. Because the XML-RPC handler does not validate the Content-Type header, an attacker-controlled webpage can issue a CORS "simple request" (POST with Content-Type: text/plain) containing a valid XML-RPC payload. The browser sends the request without a preflight check, the server processes the XML body and returns the full system monitoring dataset, and the wildcard CORS header lets the attacker's JavaScript read the response. The result is complete exfiltration of hostname, OS version, IP addresses, CPU/memory/disk/network stats, and the full process list including command lines (which often contain tokens, passwords, or internal paths). This issue has been patched in version 4.5.3. | ||||
| CVE-2026-26026 | 1 Glpi-project | 1 Glpi | 2026-04-08 | 9.1 Critical |
| GLPI is a free asset and IT management software package. From 11.0.0 to before 11.0.6, template injection by an administrator lead to RCE. This vulnerability is fixed in 11.0.6. | ||||
| CVE-2024-6386 | 1 Wpml | 1 Wpml | 2026-04-08 | 9.9 Critical |
| The WPML plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Remote Code Execution in all versions up to, and including, 4.6.12 via Twig Server-Side Template Injection. This is due to missing input validation and sanitization on the render function. This makes it possible for authenticated attackers, with Contributor-level access and above, to execute code on the server. | ||||
| CVE-2024-3562 | 1 Custom Field Suite Project | 1 Custom Field Suite | 2026-04-08 | 8.8 High |
| The Custom Field Suite plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to PHP Code Injection in all versions up to, and including, 2.6.7 via the Loop custom field. This is due to insufficient sanitization of input prior to being used in a call to the eval() function. This makes it possible for authenticated attackers, with contributor-level access and above, to execute arbitrary PHP code on the server. | ||||
| CVE-2024-11635 | 1 Iptanus | 1 Wordpress File Upload | 2026-04-08 | 9.8 Critical |
| The WordPress File Upload plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Remote Code Execution in all versions up to, and including, 4.24.12 via the 'wfu_ABSPATH' cookie parameter. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to execute code on the server. | ||||
| CVE-2023-6996 | 1 Vegacorp | 1 Display Custom Fields In The Frontend - Post And User Profile Fields | 2026-04-08 | 8.8 High |
| The Display custom fields in the frontend – Post and User Profile Fields plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Code Injection via the plugin's vg_display_data shortcode in all versions up to, and including, 1.2.1 due to insufficient input validation and restriction on access to that shortcode. This makes it possible for authenticated attackers with contributor-level and above permissions to call arbitrary functions and execute code. | ||||
| CVE-2023-4142 | 1 Smackcoders | 1 Wp Ultimate Csv Importer | 2026-04-08 | 8 High |
| The WP Ultimate CSV Importer plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Remote Code Execution in versions up to, and including, 7.9.8 via the '->cus1' parameter. This allows authenticated attackers with author-level permissions or above, if the administrator previously grants access in the plugin settings, to execute code on the server. The author resolved this vulnerability by removing the ability for authors and editors to import files, please note that this means remote code execution is still possible for site administrators, use the plugin with caution. | ||||
| CVE-2023-4141 | 1 Smackcoders | 1 Wp Ultimate Csv Importer | 2026-04-08 | 8 High |
| The WP Ultimate CSV Importer plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Remote Code Execution in versions up to, and including, 7.9.8 via the '->cus2' parameter. This allows authenticated attackers with author-level permissions or above, if the administrator previously grants access in the plugin settings, to create a PHP file and execute code on the server. The author resolved this vulnerability by removing the ability for authors and editors to import files, please note that this means php file creation is still allowed for site administrators, use the plugin with caution. | ||||
| CVE-2022-45063 | 3 Fedoraproject, Invisible-island, Redhat | 3 Fedora, Xterm, Enterprise Linux | 2026-04-08 | 9.8 Critical |
| xterm before 375 allows code execution via font ops, e.g., because an OSC 50 response may have Ctrl-g and therefore lead to command execution within the vi line-editing mode of Zsh. NOTE: font ops are not allowed in the xterm default configurations of some Linux distributions. | ||||