| CVE |
Vendors |
Products |
Updated |
CVSS v3.1 |
| Cross site request forgery vulnerability in Junos Space before 15.2R2 allows remote attackers to perform certain administrative actions on Junos Space. |
| Cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in WSO2 Carbon 4.4.5 allows remote attackers to hijack the authentication of privileged users for requests that shutdown a server via a shutdown action to server-admin/proxy_ajaxprocessor.jsp. |
| Atlassian JIRA Server before 7.1.9 has CSRF in auditing/settings. |
| Apache Wicket 6.x before 6.25.0, 7.x before 7.5.0, and 8.0.0-M1 provide a CSRF prevention measure that fails to discover some cross origin requests. The mitigation is to not only check the Origin HTTP header, but also take the Referer HTTP header into account when no Origin was provided. Furthermore, not all Wicket server side targets were subjected to the CSRF check. This was also fixed. |
| IBM Emptoris Strategic Supply Management Platform 10.0.0.x through 10.1.1.x is vulnerable to cross-site request forgery which could allow an attacker to execute malicious and unauthorized actions transmitted from a user that the website trusts. IBM X-Force ID: 120657. |
| BlackCat CMS 1.2 allows remote authenticated users to inject arbitrary PHP code into info.php via a crafted new_modulename parameter to backend/addons/ajax_create.php. NOTE: this can be exploited via CSRF. |
| diag.cgi in Pulse Connect Secure 8.2R1 through 8.2R5, 8.1R1 through 8.1R10 and Pulse Policy Secure 5.3R1 through 5.3R5, 5.2R1 through 5.2R8, and 5.1R1 through 5.1R10 allow remote attackers to hijack the authentication of administrators for requests to start tcpdump, related to the lack of anti-CSRF tokens. |
| CSRF in Bitly oauth2_proxy 2.1 during authentication flow |
| The RealTime RWR-3G-100 Router Firmware Version : Ver1.0.56 is affected by CSRF an attack that forces an end user to execute unwanted actions on a web application in which they're currently authenticated. |
| rsync 3.1.3-development before 2017-10-24 mishandles archaic checksums, which makes it easier for remote attackers to bypass intended access restrictions. NOTE: the rsync development branch has significant use beyond the rsync developers, e.g., the code has been copied for use in various GitHub projects. |
| Cross-Site Request Forgery exists in OctoberCMS 1.0.426 (aka Build 426) due to improper validation of CSRF tokens for postback handling, allowing an attacker to successfully take over the victim's account. The attack bypasses a protection mechanism involving X-CSRF headers and CSRF tokens via a certain _handler postback variable. |
| The DynamicMetadataProvider class in saml/saml2/metadata/impl/DynamicMetadataProvider.cpp in OpenSAML-C in OpenSAML before 2.6.1 fails to properly configure itself with the MetadataFilter plugins and does not perform critical security checks such as signature verification, enforcement of validity periods, and other checks specific to deployments, aka CPPOST-105. |
| The ZKTime Web Software 2.0.1.12280 allows the Administrator to elevate the privileges of the application user using a 'password_change()' function of the Modify Password component, reachable via the old_password, new_password1, and new_password2 parameters to the /accounts/password_change/ URI. An attacker takes advantage of this scenario and creates a crafted CSRF link to add himself as an administrator to the ZKTime Web Software. He then uses social engineering methods to trick the administrator into clicking the forged HTTP request. The request is executed and the attacker becomes the Administrator of the ZKTime Web Software. If the vulnerability is successfully exploited, then an attacker (who would be a normal user of the web application) can escalate his privileges and become the administrator of ZKTime Web Software. |
| Cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in CS-Cart Japanese Edition v4.3.10 and earlier (excluding v2 and v3), CS-Cart Multivendor Japanese Edition v4.3.10 and earlier (excluding v2 and v3) allows remote attackers to hijack the authentication of administrators via unspecified vectors. |
| HedEx Earlier than V200R006C00 versions has a cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability. An attacker could trick a user into accessing a website containing malicious scripts which may tamper with configurations and interrupt normal services. |
| Multiple cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerabilities in the web interface in the Scheduler in SolarWinds (formerly Serv-U) FTP Voyager 16.2.0 allow remote attackers to hijack the authentication of users for requests that (1) change the admin password, (2) terminate the scheduler, or (3) possibly execute arbitrary commands via crafted requests to Admin/XML/Result.xml. |
| Multiple cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerabilities in the Podcast feature in Subsonic 6.1.1 allow remote attackers to hijack the authentication of users for requests that (1) subscribe to a podcast via the add parameter to podcastReceiverAdmin.view or (2) update Internet Radio Settings via the urlRedirectCustomUrl parameter to networkSettings.view. NOTE: These vulnerabilities can be exploited to conduct server-side request forgery (SSRF) attacks. |
| admidio 3.2.8 has CSRF in adm_program/modules/members/members_function.php with an impact of deleting arbitrary user accounts. |
| A Cross-Site Request Forgery (CWE-352) vulnerability in Directory Server (aka Enterprise Server Administration web UI) in Micro Focus Enterprise Developer and Enterprise Server 2.3 and earlier, 2.3 Update 1 before Hotfix 8, and 2.3 Update 2 before Hotfix 9 allows remote unauthenticated attackers to view and alter (CWE-275) configuration information and inject OS commands (CWE-78) via forged requests. |
| Routes used to stop running Metasploit tasks (either particular ones or all tasks) allowed GET requests. Only POST requests should have been allowed, as the stop/stop_all routes change the state of the service. This could have allowed an attacker to stop currently-running Metasploit tasks by getting an authenticated user to execute JavaScript. As of Metasploit 4.14.0 (Update 2017061301), the routes for stopping tasks only allow POST requests, which validate the presence of a secret token to prevent CSRF attacks. |
