Export limit exceeded: 361813 CVEs match your query. Please refine your search to export 10,000 CVEs or fewer.
Search
Search Results (1210 CVEs found)
| CVE | Vendors | Products | Updated | CVSS v3.1 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CVE-2010-1574 | 1 Cisco | 2 Industrial Ethernet 3000, Ios | 2025-04-11 | N/A |
| IOS 12.2(52)SE and 12.2(52)SE1 on Cisco Industrial Ethernet (IE) 3000 series switches has (1) a community name of public for RO access and (2) a community name of private for RW access, which makes it easier for remote attackers to modify the configuration or obtain potentially sensitive information via SNMP requests, aka Bug ID CSCtf25589. | ||||
| CVE-2010-2836 | 1 Cisco | 1 Ios | 2025-04-11 | N/A |
| Memory leak in the SSL VPN feature in Cisco IOS 12.4, 15.0, and 15.1, when HTTP port redirection is enabled, allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (memory consumption) by improperly disconnecting SSL sessions, leading to connections that remain in the CLOSE-WAIT state, aka Bug ID CSCtg21685. | ||||
| CVE-2010-2834 | 1 Cisco | 3 Ios, Ios Xe, Unified Communications Manager | 2025-04-11 | N/A |
| Cisco IOS 12.2 through 12.4 and 15.0 through 15.1, Cisco IOS XE 2.5.x and 2.6.x before 2.6.1, and Cisco Unified Communications Manager (aka CUCM, formerly CallManager) 6.x before 6.1(5)SU1, 7.x before 7.1(5), and 8.0 before 8.0(2) allow remote attackers to cause a denial of service (device reload or voice-services outage) via crafted SIP registration traffic over UDP, aka Bug IDs CSCtf72678 and CSCtf14987. | ||||
| CVE-2012-0362 | 1 Cisco | 1 Ios | 2025-04-11 | N/A |
| The extended ACL functionality in Cisco IOS 12.2(58)SE2 and 15.0(1)SE discards all lines that end with a log or time keyword, which allows remote attackers to bypass intended access restrictions in opportunistic circumstances by sending network traffic, aka Bug ID CSCts01106. | ||||
| CVE-2010-0586 | 1 Cisco | 1 Ios | 2025-04-11 | N/A |
| Cisco IOS 12.1 through 12.4, when Cisco Unified Communications Manager Express (CME) or Cisco Unified Survivable Remote Site Telephony (SRST) is enabled, allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (device reload) via a malformed Skinny Client Control Protocol (SCCP) message, aka Bug ID CSCsz49741, the "SCCP Request Handling Denial of Service Vulnerability." | ||||
| CVE-2010-4683 | 1 Cisco | 1 Ios | 2025-04-11 | N/A |
| Memory leak in Cisco IOS before 15.0(1)XA5 might allow remote attackers to cause a denial of service (memory consumption) by sending a crafted SIP REGISTER message over UDP, aka Bug ID CSCtg41733. | ||||
| CVE-2010-0585 | 1 Cisco | 1 Ios | 2025-04-11 | N/A |
| Cisco IOS 12.1 through 12.4, when Cisco Unified Communications Manager Express (CME) or Cisco Unified Survivable Remote Site Telephony (SRST) is enabled, allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (device reload) via a malformed Skinny Client Control Protocol (SCCP) message, aka Bug ID CSCsz48614, the "SCCP Packet Processing Denial of Service Vulnerability." | ||||
| CVE-2010-0584 | 1 Cisco | 1 Ios | 2025-04-11 | N/A |
| Unspecified vulnerability in Cisco IOS 12.4, when NAT SCCP fragmentation support is enabled, allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (device reload) via crafted Skinny Client Control Protocol (SCCP) packets, aka Bug ID CSCsy09250. | ||||
| CVE-2010-0583 | 1 Cisco | 1 Ios | 2025-04-11 | N/A |
| Memory leak in the H.323 implementation in Cisco IOS 12.1 through 12.4, and 15.0M before 15.0(1)M1, allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (memory consumption and device reload) via malformed H.323 packets, aka Bug ID CSCtb93855. | ||||
| CVE-2010-0582 | 1 Cisco | 1 Ios | 2025-04-11 | N/A |
| Cisco IOS 12.1 through 12.4, and 15.0M before 15.0(1)M1, allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (interface queue wedge) via malformed H.323 packets, aka Bug ID CSCta19962. | ||||
| CVE-2012-0339 | 1 Cisco | 1 Ios | 2025-04-11 | N/A |
| Cisco IOS 12.2 through 12.4 and 15.0 does not recognize the vrf-also keyword during enforcement of access-class commands, which allows remote attackers to establish TELNET connections from arbitrary source IP addresses via a standard TELNET client, aka Bug ID CSCsi77774. | ||||
| CVE-2010-0581 | 1 Cisco | 1 Ios | 2025-04-11 | N/A |
| Unspecified vulnerability in the SIP implementation in Cisco IOS 12.3 and 12.4 allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code via a malformed SIP message, aka Bug ID CSCsz89904, the "SIP Packet Parsing Arbitrary Code Execution Vulnerability." | ||||
| CVE-2013-6981 | 1 Cisco | 1 Ios Xe | 2025-04-11 | N/A |
| Cisco IOS XE 3.7S(.1) and earlier allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (Packet Processor crash) via fragmented MPLS IP packets, aka Bug ID CSCul00709. | ||||
| CVE-2013-6979 | 1 Cisco | 1 Ios Xe | 2025-04-11 | N/A |
| The VTY authentication implementation in Cisco IOS XE 03.02.xxSE and 03.03.xxSE incorrectly relies on the Linux-IOS internal-network configuration, which allows remote attackers to bypass authentication by leveraging access to a 192.168.x.2 source IP address, aka Bug ID CSCuj90227. | ||||
| CVE-2013-6706 | 1 Cisco | 1 Ios Xe | 2025-04-11 | N/A |
| The Cisco Express Forwarding processing module in Cisco IOS XE allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (device reload) via crafted MPLS packets that are not properly handled during IP header validation, aka Bug ID CSCuj23992. | ||||
| CVE-2013-6705 | 1 Cisco | 2 Ios, Ios Xe | 2025-04-11 | N/A |
| The IP Device Tracking (IPDT) feature in Cisco IOS and IOS XE allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (IPDT AVL corruption and device reload) via a crafted sequence of ARP packets, aka Bug ID CSCuh38133. | ||||
| CVE-2013-6704 | 1 Cisco | 1 Ios Xe | 2025-04-11 | N/A |
| Cisco IOS XE does not properly manage memory for TFTP UDP flows, which allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (memory consumption) via TFTP (1) client or (2) server traffic, aka Bug IDs CSCuh09324 and CSCty42686. | ||||
| CVE-2020-3359 | 1 Cisco | 15 2610xm, 2611xm, 2612 and 12 more | 2024-12-19 | 8.6 High |
| A vulnerability in the multicast DNS (mDNS) feature of Cisco IOS XE Software for Cisco Catalyst 9800 Series Wireless Controllers could allow an unauthenticated, remote attacker to cause a denial of service (DoS) condition. The vulnerability is due to improper validation of mDNS packets. An attacker could exploit this vulnerability by sending a crafted mDNS packet to an affected device. A successful exploit could cause a device to reload, resulting in a DoS condition. | ||||
| CVE-2020-3503 | 1 Cisco | 128 1100-4g Integrated Services Router, 1100-4gltegb Integrated Services Router, 1100-4gltena Integrated Services Router and 125 more | 2024-12-19 | 6 Medium |
| A vulnerability in the file system permissions of Cisco IOS XE Software could allow an authenticated, local attacker to obtain read and write access to critical configuration or system files. The vulnerability is due to insufficient file system permissions on an affected device. An attacker could exploit this vulnerability by connecting to an affected device's guest shell, and accessing or modifying restricted files. A successful exploit could allow the attacker to view or modify restricted information or configurations that are normally not accessible to system administrators. | ||||
| CVE-2020-3393 | 1 Cisco | 128 1100-4g Integrated Services Router, 1100-4gltegb Integrated Services Router, 1100-4gltena Integrated Services Router and 125 more | 2024-12-19 | 6 Medium |
| A vulnerability in the application-hosting subsystem of Cisco IOS XE Software could allow an authenticated, local attacker to elevate privileges to root on an affected device. The attacker could execute IOS XE commands outside the application-hosting subsystem Docker container as well as on the underlying Linux operating system. These commands could be run as the root user. The vulnerability is due to a combination of two factors: (a) incomplete input validation of the user payload of CLI commands, and (b) improper role-based access control (RBAC) when commands are issued at the command line within the application-hosting subsystem. An attacker could exploit this vulnerability by using a CLI command with crafted user input. A successful exploit could allow the lower-privileged attacker to execute arbitrary CLI commands with root privileges. The attacker would need valid user credentials to exploit this vulnerability. | ||||