Search Results (3367 CVEs found)

CVE Vendors Products Updated CVSS v3.1
CVE-2026-33990 1 Docker 2 Model-runner, Model Runner 2026-04-15 9.1 Critical
Docker Model Runner (DMR) is software used to manage, run, and deploy AI models using Docker. Prior to version 1.1.25, Docker Model Runner contains an SSRF vulnerability in its OCI registry token exchange flow. When pulling a model, Model Runner follows the realm URL from the registry's WWW-Authenticate header without validating the scheme, hostname, or IP range. A malicious OCI registry can set the realm to an internal URL (e.g., http://127.0.0.1:3000/), causing Model Runner running on the host to make arbitrary GET requests to internal services and reflect the full response body back to the caller. Additionally, the token exchange mechanism can relay data from internal services back to the attacker-controlled registry via the Authorization: Bearer header. This issue has been patched in version 1.1.25. For Docker Desktop users, enabling Enhanced Container Isolation (ECI) blocks container access to Model Runner, preventing exploitation. However, if the Docker Model Runner is exposed to localhost over TCP in specific configurations, the vulnerability is still exploitable.
CVE-2026-34936 2 Mervinpraison, Praison 2 Praisonai, Praisonai 2026-04-15 7.7 High
PraisonAI is a multi-agent teams system. Prior to version 4.5.90, passthrough() and apassthrough() in praisonai accept a caller-controlled api_base parameter that is concatenated with endpoint and passed directly to httpx.Client.request() when the litellm primary path raises AttributeError. No URL scheme validation, private IP filtering, or domain allowlist is applied, allowing requests to any host reachable from the server. This issue has been patched in version 4.5.90.
CVE-2026-35036 2 Ech0, Lin-snow 2 Ech0, Ech0 2026-04-15 7.5 High
Ech0 is an open-source, self-hosted publishing platform for personal idea sharing. Prior to 4.2.8, Ech0 implements link preview (editor fetches a page title) through GET /api/website/title. That is legitimate product behavior, but the implementation is unsafe: the route is unauthenticated, accepts a fully attacker-controlled URL, performs a server-side GET, reads the entire response body into memory (io.ReadAll). There is no host allowlist, no SSRF filter, and InsecureSkipVerify: true on the outbound client. Anyone who can reach the instance can force the Ech0 server to open HTTP/HTTPS URLs of their choice as seen from the server’s network position (Docker bridge, VPC, localhost from the process view). This vulnerability is fixed in 4.2.8.
CVE-2026-35516 2 Kovah, Linkace 2 Linkace, Linkace 2026-04-15 5 Medium
LinkAce is a self-hosted archive to collect website links. Prior to 2.5.4, LinkRepository::update and CheckLinksCommand::checkLink do not check for private IPs. An authenticated user can read responses from internal services (AWS IMDSv1, cloud metadata, internal APIs) by creating a link with a public URL and then updating it to a private IP. The links:check cron job makes the request server-side without IP filtering. This can expose cloud credentials, internal service data, and network topology. This vulnerability is fixed in 2.5.4.
CVE-2026-39361 1 Openobserve 1 Openobserve 2026-04-15 7.7 High
OpenObserve is a cloud-native observability platform. In 0.70.3 and earlier, the validate_enrichment_url function in src/handler/http/request/enrichment_table/mod.rs fails to block IPv6 addresses because Rust's url crate returns them with surrounding brackets (e.g. "[::1]" not "::1"). An authenticated attacker can reach internal services blocked from external access. On cloud deployments this enables retrieval of IAM credentials via AWS IMDSv1 (169.254.169.254), GCP metadata, or Azure IMDS. On self-hosted deployments it allows probing internal network services.
CVE-2023-46945 1 Qd-today 1 Qd 2026-04-15 9.1 Critical
QD 20230821 is vulnerable to Server-side request forgery (SSRF) via a crafted request
CVE-2026-31017 1 Frappe 3 Erpnext, Framework, Frappe 2026-04-15 9.1 Critical
A Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability exists in the Print Format functionality of ERPNext v16.0.1 and Frappe Framework v16.1.1, where user-supplied HTML is insufficiently sanitized before being rendered into PDF. When generating PDFs from user-controlled HTML content, the application allows the inclusion of HTML elements such as <iframe> that reference external resources. The PDF rendering engine automatically fetches these resources on the server side. An attacker can abuse this behavior to force the server to make arbitrary HTTP requests to internal services, including cloud metadata endpoints, potentially leading to sensitive information disclosure.
CVE-2025-50228 2 Cherry-toto, Jizhicms 2 Jizhicms, Jizhicms 2026-04-15 9.1 Critical
Jizhicms v2.5.4 is vulnerable to Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) in User Evaluation, Message, and Comment modules.
CVE-2026-30232 2 Chartbrew, Depomo 2 Chartbrew, Chartbrew 2026-04-15 9.6 Critical
Chartbrew is an open-source web application that can connect directly to databases and APIs and use the data to create charts. Prior to 4.8.5, Chartbrew allows authenticated users to create API data connections with arbitrary URLs. The server fetches these URLs using request-promise without any IP address validation, enabling Server-Side Request Forgery attacks against internal networks and cloud metadata endpoints. This vulnerability is fixed in 4.8.5.
CVE-2026-40168 2 Gitroom, Gitroomhq 2 Postiz, Postiz-app 2026-04-15 8.2 High
Postiz is an AI social media scheduling tool. Prior to 2.21.5, the /api/public/stream endpoint is vulnerable to SSRF. Although the application validates the initially supplied URL and blocks direct private/internal hosts, it does not re-validate the final destination after HTTP redirects. As a result, an attacker can supply a public HTTPS URL that passes validation and then redirects the server-side request to an internal resource.
CVE-2026-34445 2 Linuxfoundation, Onnx 2 Onnx, Onnx 2026-04-15 8.6 High
Open Neural Network Exchange (ONNX) is an open standard for machine learning interoperability. Prior to version 1.21.0, the ExternalDataInfo class in ONNX was using Python’s setattr() function to load metadata (like file paths or data lengths) directly from an ONNX model file. It didn’t check if the "keys" in the file were valid. Due to this, an attacker could craft a malicious model that overwrites internal object properties. This issue has been patched in version 1.21.0.
CVE-2026-3881 2 Performance Monitor, Wordpress 2 Performance Monitor, Wordpress 2026-04-15 5.8 Medium
The Performance Monitor WordPress plugin through 1.0.6 does not validate a parameter before making a request to it, which could allow unauthenticated users to perform SSRF attacks
CVE-2026-34515 2 Aio-libs, Aiohttp 2 Aiohttp, Aiohttp 2026-04-15 7.5 High
AIOHTTP is an asynchronous HTTP client/server framework for asyncio and Python. Prior to version 3.13.4, on Windows the static resource handler may expose information about a NTLMv2 remote path. This issue has been patched in version 3.13.4.
CVE-2026-2286 1 Crewai 1 Crewai 2026-04-15 9.8 Critical
CrewAI contains a server-side request forgery vulnerability that enables content acquisition from internal and cloud services, facilitated by the RAG search tools not properly validating URLs provided at runtime.
CVE-2024-10206 2026-04-15 N/A
A Server-Side Request Forgery vulnerability in the APROL Web Portal used in B&R APROL <4.4-00P5 may allow an unauthenticated network-based attacker to force the web server to request arbitrary URLs.
CVE-2025-64180 1 Manager-io 1 Manager 2026-04-15 10 Critical
Manager-io/Manager is accounting software. In Manager Desktop and Server versions 25.11.1.3085 and below, a critical vulnerability permits unauthorized access to internal network resources. The flaw lies in the fundamental design of the DNS validation mechanism. A Time-of-Check Time-of-Use (TOCTOU) condition that allows attackers to bypass network isolation and access internal services, cloud metadata endpoints, and protected network segments. The Desktop edition requires no authentication; the Server edition requires only standard authentication. This issue is fixed in version 25.11.1.3086.
CVE-2025-64252 2 Marcomilesi, Wordpress 2 Anac Xml Viewer, Wordpress 2026-04-15 4.9 Medium
Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability in Marco Milesi ANAC XML Viewer anac-xml-viewer allows Server Side Request Forgery.This issue affects ANAC XML Viewer: from n/a through <= 1.8.2.
CVE-2025-3192 1 Spatie 1 Browsershot 2026-04-15 8.2 High
Versions of the package spatie/browsershot from 0.0.0 are vulnerable to Server-side Request Forgery (SSRF) in the setUrl() function due to a missing restriction on user input, enabling attackers to access localhost and list all of its directories.
CVE-2025-6142 2026-04-15 6.3 Medium
A vulnerability was found in Intera InHire up to 20250530. It has been declared as critical. Affected by this vulnerability is an unknown functionality. The manipulation of the argument 29chcotoo9 leads to server-side request forgery. The attack can be launched remotely. The exploit has been disclosed to the public and may be used. The vendor was contacted early about this disclosure but did not respond in any way.
CVE-2020-36851 2026-04-15 N/A
Rob -- W / cors-anywhere instances configured as an open proxy allow unauthenticated external users to induce the server to make HTTP requests to arbitrary targets (SSRF). Because the proxy forwards requests and headers, an attacker can reach internal-only endpoints and link-local metadata services, retrieve instance role credentials or other sensitive metadata, and interact with internal APIs and services that are not intended to be internet-facing. The vulnerability is exploitable by sending crafted requests to the proxy with the target resource encoded in the URL; many cors-anywhere deployments forward arbitrary methods and headers (including PUT), which can permit exploitation of IMDSv2 workflows as well as access to internal management APIs. Successful exploitation can result in theft of cloud credentials, unauthorized access to internal services, remote code execution or privilege escalation (depending on reachable backends), data exfiltration, and full compromise of cloud resources. Mitigation includes: restricting the proxy to trusted origins or authentication, whitelisting allowed target hosts, preventing access to link-local and internal IP ranges, removing support for unsafe HTTP methods/headers, enabling cloud provider mitigations, and deploying network-level protections.