Export limit exceeded: 10717 CVEs match your query. Please refine your search to export 10,000 CVEs or fewer.
Search
Search Results (10628 CVEs found)
| CVE | Vendors | Products | Updated | CVSS v3.1 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CVE-2023-5406 | 2026-04-15 | 5.9 Medium | ||
| Server communication with a controller can lead to remote code execution using a specially crafted message from the controller. See Honeywell Security Notification for recommendations on upgrading and versioning. | ||||
| CVE-2024-43648 | 2026-04-15 | 8.8 High | ||
| Command injection in the <redacted> parameter of a <redacted>.exe request leads to remote code execution as the root user. This issue affects Iocharger firmware for AC models before version 24120701. Likelihood: Moderate – This action is not a common place for command injection vulnerabilities to occur. Thus, an attacker will likely only be able to find this vulnerability by reverse-engineering the firmware or trying it on all <redacted> fields. The attacker will also need a (low privilege) account to gain access to the <redacted> binary, or convince a user with such access to execute a payload. Impact: Critical – The attacker has full control over the charging station as the root user, and can arbitrarily add, modify and delete files and services. CVSS clarification. The attack can be executed over any network connection the station is listening to and serves the web interface (AV:N), and there are no additional security measure sin place that need to be circumvented (AC:L), the attack does not rely on preconditions (AT:N). The attack does require authentication, but the level of authentication is irrelevant (PR:L), it does not require user interaction (UI:N). If is a full system compromise, potentially fully compromising confidentiality, integrity and availability of the devicer (VC:H/VI:H/VA:H). A compromised charger can be used to "pivot" onto networks that should otherwise be closed, cause a low confidentiality and interity impact on subsequent systems. (SC:L/SI:L/SA:H). Because this device is an EV charger handing significant amounts of power, we suspect this vulnerability can have a safety impact (S:P). The attack can be automated (AU:Y). | ||||
| CVE-2024-43649 | 2026-04-15 | 8.8 High | ||
| Authenticated command injection in the filename of a <redacted>.exe request leads to remote code execution as the root user. This issue affects Iocharger firmware for AC models before version 24120701. Likelihood: Moderate – This action is not a common place for command injection vulnerabilities to occur. Thus, an attacker will likely only be able to find this vulnerability by reverse-engineering the firmware or trying it on all <redacted> fields. The attacker will also need a (low privilege) account to gain access to the <redacted> binary, or convince a user with such access to execute a payload. Impact: Critical – The attacker has full control over the charging station as the root user, and can arbitrarily add, modify and delete files and services. CVSS clarification: This attack can be performed over any network conenction serving the web interfacr (AV:N), and there are not additional mitigating measures that need to be circumvented (AC:L) or other prerequisites (AT:N). The attack does require privileges, but the level does not matter (PR:L), there is no user interaction required (UI:N). The attack leeds to a full compromised of the charger (VC:H/VI:H/VA:H) and a compromised charger can be used to "pivot" to networks that should normally not be reachable (SC:L/SI:L/SA:H). Because this is an EV chargers with significant pwoer, there is a potential safety imp0act (S:P). THis attack can be automated (AU:Y). | ||||
| CVE-2025-32409 | 2026-04-15 | 8.1 High | ||
| Ratta SuperNote A6 X2 Nomad before December 2024 allows remote code execution because an arbitrary firmware image (signed with debug keys) can be sent to TCP port 60002, and placed into the correct image-update location as a consequence of both directory traversal and unintended handling of concurrency. | ||||
| CVE-2024-43663 | 2026-04-15 | 9.8 Critical | ||
| There are many buffer overflow vulnerabilities present in several CGI binaries of the charging station.This issue affects Iocharger firmware for AC model chargers beforeversion 24120701. Likelihood: High – Given the prevalence of these buffer overflows, and the clear error message of the web server, an attacker is very likely to be able to find these vulnerabilities. Impact: Low – Usually, overflowing one of these buffers just causes a segmentation fault of the CGI binary, which causes the web server to return a 502 Bad Gateway error. However the webserver itself is not affected, and no DoS can be achieved. Abusing these buffer overflows in a meaningful way requires highly technical knowledge, especially since ASLR also seems to be enabled on the charging station. However, a skilled attacker might be able to use one of these buffer overflows to obtain remote code execution. CVSS clarification. The attack can be executed over any network connection the station is listening to and serves the web interface (AV:N), and there are no additional security measure sin place that need to be circumvented (AC:L), the attack does not rely on preconditions (AT:N). The attack does require authentication, but the level of authentication is irrelevant (PR:L), it does not require user interaction (UI:N). The attack has a small impact on the availability of the device (VC:N/VI:N/VA:L). There is no impact on subsequent systems. (SC:N/SI:N/SA:N). While this device is an EV charger handing significant amounts of power, we do not expect this vulnerability to have a safety impact. The attack can be automated (AU:Y). | ||||
| CVE-2024-56908 | 2026-04-15 | 6.8 Medium | ||
| In Perfex Crm < 3.2.1, an authenticated attacker can send a crafted HTTP POST request to the affected upload_sales_file endpoint. By providing malicious input in the rel_id parameter, combined with improper input validation, the attacker can bypass restrictions and upload arbitrary files to directories of their choice, potentially leading to remote code execution or server compromise. | ||||
| CVE-2024-25331 | 2026-04-15 | 9.3 Critical | ||
| DIR-822 Rev. B Firmware v2.02KRB09 and DIR-822-CA Rev. B Firmware v2.03WWb01 suffer from a LAN-Side Unauthenticated Remote Code Execution (RCE) vulnerability elevated from HNAP Stack-Based Buffer Overflow. | ||||
| CVE-2025-11548 | 1 Ibi | 1 Webfocus Business Intelligence | 2026-04-15 | N/A |
| A remote, unauthenticated privilege escalation in ibi WebFOCUS allows an attacker to gain administrative access to the application which may lead to unauthenticated Remote Code Execution | ||||
| CVE-2024-4345 | 2026-04-15 | 9.8 Critical | ||
| The Startklar Elementor Addons plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to arbitrary file uploads due to insufficient file type validation in the 'process' function in the 'startklarDropZoneUploadProcess' class in versions up to, and including, 1.7.13. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to upload arbitrary files on the affected site's server which may make remote code execution possible. | ||||
| CVE-2025-31119 | 2026-04-15 | 7.7 High | ||
| generator-jhipster-entity-audit is a JHipster module to enable entity audit and audit log page. Prior to 5.9.1, generator-jhipster-entity-audit allows unsafe reflection when having Javers selected as Entity Audit Framework. If an attacker manages to place some malicious classes into the classpath and also has access to these REST interface for calling the mentioned REST endpoints, using these lines of code can lead to unintended remote code execution. This vulnerability is fixed in 5.9.1. | ||||
| CVE-2025-32779 | 2026-04-15 | 6.5 Medium | ||
| E.D.D.I (Enhanced Dialog Driven Interface) is a middleware to connect and manage LLM API bots. In versions before 5.5.0, an attacker with access to the `/backup/import` API endpoint can write arbitrary files to locations outside the intended extraction directory due to a Zip Slip vulnerability. Although the application runs as a non-root user (`185`), limiting direct impact on system-level files, this vulnerability can still be exploited to overwrite application files (e.g., JAR libraries) owned by the application user. This overwrite can potentially lead to Remote Code Execution (RCE) within the application's context. This issue has been patched in version 5.5.0. | ||||
| CVE-2024-27171 | 1 Toshibatec | 40 E-studio-2010-ac, E-studio-2015-nc, E-studio-2020 Ac and 37 more | 2026-04-15 | 7.4 High |
| A remote attacker using the insecure upload functionality will be able to overwrite any Python file and get Remote Code Execution. As for the affected products/models/versions, see the reference URL. | ||||
| CVE-2024-27172 | 1 Toshibatec | 50 E-studio-2010-ac, E-studio-2015-nc, E-studio-2018 A and 47 more | 2026-04-15 | 9.8 Critical |
| Remote Command program allows an attacker to get Remote Code Execution. As for the affected products/models/versions, see the reference URL. | ||||
| CVE-2023-6095 | 2026-04-15 | 8.9 High | ||
| Vladimir Kononovich, a Security Researcher has found a flaw that allows for a remote code execution on the DVR. An attacker could inject malicious HTTP headers into request packets to execute arbitrary code. The manufacturer has released patch firmware for the flaw, please refer to the manufacturer's report for details and workarounds. | ||||
| CVE-2023-6116 | 1 Hanwhavision | 1 Xrn-420s | 2026-04-15 | 8.9 High |
| Team ENVY, a Security Research TEAM has found a flaw that allows for a remote code execution on the camera. An attacker could inject malicious into http request packets to execute arbitrary code. The manufacturer has released patch firmware for the flaw, please refer to the manufacturer's report for details and workarounds. | ||||
| CVE-2025-41451 | 1 Danfoss | 1 Ak-sm8xxa Series | 2026-04-15 | N/A |
| Improper neutralization of alarm-to-mail configuration fields used in an OS shell Command ('Command Injection') in Danfoss AK-SM8xxA Series prior to version 4.3.1, leading to a potential post-authenticated remote code execution on an attacked system. | ||||
| CVE-2024-4389 | 1 Averta | 7 Add Image Slider, Carousel Slider, Coupon Popup and 4 more | 2026-04-15 | 8.8 High |
| The Slider and Carousel slider by Depicter plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to arbitrary file uploads due to missing file type validation in the uploadFile function in all versions up to, and including, 3.1.1. This makes it possible for authenticated attackers, with contributor access or higher, to upload arbitrary files on the affected site's server which may make remote code execution possible. | ||||
| CVE-2024-27173 | 2026-04-15 | 9.8 Critical | ||
| Remote Command program allows an attacker to get Remote Code Execution by overwriting existing Python files containing executable code. This vulnerability can be executed in combination with other vulnerabilities and difficult to execute alone. So, the CVSS score for this vulnerability alone is lower than the score listed in the "Base Score" of this vulnerability. For detail on related other vulnerabilities, please ask to the below contact point. https://www.toshibatec.com/contacts/products/ As for the affected products/models/versions, see the reference URL. | ||||
| CVE-2024-3871 | 2026-04-15 | 9.8 Critical | ||
| The Delta Electronics DVW-W02W2-E2 devices expose a web administration interface to users. This interface implements multiple features that are affected by command injections and stack overflows vulnerabilities. Successful exploitation of these flaws would allow remote unauthenticated attackers to gain remote code execution with elevated privileges on the affected devices. This issue affects DVW-W02W2-E2 through version 2.5.2. | ||||
| CVE-2024-27177 | 1 Toshibatec | 50 E-studio-2010-ac, E-studio-2015-nc, E-studio-2018 A and 47 more | 2026-04-15 | 7.2 High |
| An attacker can get Remote Code Execution by overwriting files. Overwriting files is enable by falsifying package name variable. This vulnerability can be executed in combination with other vulnerabilities and difficult to execute alone. So, the CVSS score for this vulnerability alone is lower than the score listed in the "Base Score" of this vulnerability. For detail on related other vulnerabilities, please ask to the below contact point. https://www.toshibatec.com/contacts/products/ As for the affected products/models/versions, see the reference URL. | ||||