Export limit exceeded: 350852 CVEs match your query. Please refine your search to export 10,000 CVEs or fewer.
Search
Search Results (350852 CVEs found)
| CVE | Vendors | Products | Updated | CVSS v3.1 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CVE-2026-44289 | 2 Protobuf, Protobufjs Project | 2 Protobuf, Protobufjs | 2026-05-14 | 7.5 High |
| protobufjs compiles protobuf definitions into JavaScript (JS) functions. Prior to 7.5.6 and 8.0.2, protobufjs could recurse without a depth limit while decoding nested protobuf data. This affected both skipping unknown group fields and generated decoding of nested message fields. A crafted protobuf binary payload could cause the JavaScript call stack to be exhausted during decoding. This vulnerability is fixed in 7.5.6 and 8.0.2. | ||||
| CVE-2026-44290 | 2 Protobuf, Protobufjs Project | 2 Protobuf, Protobufjs | 2026-05-14 | 7.5 High |
| protobufjs compiles protobuf definitions into JavaScript (JS) functions. Prior to 7.5.6 and 8.0.2, protobufjs allowed certain schema option paths to traverse through inherited object properties while applying options. A crafted protobuf schema or JSON descriptor could cause option handling to write to properties on global JavaScript constructors, corrupting process-wide built-in functionality. This vulnerability is fixed in 7.5.6 and 8.0.2. | ||||
| CVE-2026-44291 | 2 Protobuf, Protobufjs Project | 2 Protobuf, Protobufjs | 2026-05-14 | 8.1 High |
| protobufjs compiles protobuf definitions into JavaScript (JS) functions. Prior to 7.5.6 and 8.0.2, protobufjs used plain objects with inherited prototypes for internal type lookup tables used by generated encode and decode functions. If Object.prototype had already been polluted, those lookup tables could resolve attacker-controlled inherited properties as valid protobuf type information. This could cause attacker-controlled strings to be emitted into generated JavaScript code. This vulnerability is fixed in 7.5.6 and 8.0.2. | ||||
| CVE-2026-44292 | 2 Protobuf, Protobufjs Project | 2 Protobuf, Protobufjs | 2026-05-14 | 5.3 Medium |
| protobufjs compiles protobuf definitions into JavaScript (JS) functions. Prior to 7.5.6 and 8.0.2, protobufjs generated message constructors copied enumerable properties from a provided properties object without filtering the __proto__ key. If an application constructed a message from an attacker-controlled plain object, an own enumerable __proto__ property could alter the prototype of that individual message instance. This vulnerability is fixed in 7.5.6 and 8.0.2. | ||||
| CVE-2026-44293 | 2 Protobuf, Protobufjs Project | 2 Protobuf, Protobufjs | 2026-05-14 | 8.8 High |
| protobufjs compiles protobuf definitions into JavaScript (JS) functions. Prior to 7.5.6 and 8.0.2, protobufjs generated JavaScript for toObject conversion could include an unsafe expression derived from a schema-controlled bytes field default value. A crafted descriptor with a non-string default value for a bytes field could cause attacker-controlled code to be emitted into the generated conversion function. This vulnerability is fixed in 7.5.6 and 8.0.2. | ||||
| CVE-2026-44294 | 2 Protobuf, Protobufjs Project | 2 Protobuf, Protobufjs | 2026-05-14 | 5.3 Medium |
| protobufjs compiles protobuf definitions into JavaScript (JS) functions. Prior to 7.5.6 and 8.0.2, protobufjs generated JavaScript property accessors from schema-controlled field and oneof names. Certain control characters in field names were not escaped before being embedded into generated function bodies. A crafted schema or JSON descriptor could therefore cause generated encode, decode, verify, or conversion functions to fail during compilation. This vulnerability is fixed in 7.5.6 and 8.0.2. | ||||
| CVE-2026-45740 | 2 Protobuf, Protobufjs Project | 2 Protobuf, Protobufjs | 2026-05-14 | 5.3 Medium |
| protobufjs compiles protobuf definitions into JavaScript (JS) functions. Prior to 7.5.8 and 8.2.0, protobufjs could recurse without a depth limit while expanding nested JSON descriptors through Root.fromJSON() and Namespace.addJSON(). A crafted JSON descriptor with deeply nested namespace definitions could cause the JavaScript call stack to be exhausted during descriptor loading. This vulnerability is fixed in 7.5.8 and 8.2.0. | ||||
| CVE-2026-42290 | 1 Protobuf | 1 Protobuf | 2026-05-14 | 7.8 High |
| protobufjs-cli is the command line add-on for protobuf.js. Prior to 1.2.1 and 2.0.2, pbts invoked JSDoc by building a shell command string from input file paths and executing it through child_process.exec. File paths containing shell metacharacters could therefore be interpreted by the shell instead of being passed to JSDoc as plain arguments. This vulnerability is fixed in 1.2.1 and 2.0.2. | ||||
| CVE-2026-44295 | 1 Protobuf | 1 Protobuf | 2026-05-14 | 8.7 High |
| protobufjs-cli is the command line add-on for protobuf.js. Prior to 1.2.1 and 2.0.2, pbjs static code generation could emit unsafe JavaScript identifiers derived from schema-controlled names. When generating static JavaScript from a crafted schema or JSON descriptor, certain namespace, enum, service, or derived full names could be written into the generated output without sufficient sanitization. This vulnerability is fixed in 1.2.1 and 2.0.2. | ||||
| CVE-2026-8367 | 1 Aria2 Project | 1 Aria2 | 2026-05-14 | 4.8 Medium |
| aria2c accepts a server certificate with incorrect Extended Key Usage (EKU). If the attackers compromise a certificate (with the associated private key) issued for a different purpose, they may be able to reuse it for TLS server authentication. | ||||
| CVE-2026-42557 | 1 Jupyter | 2 Jupyterlab, Notebook | 2026-05-14 | N/A |
| jupyterlab is an extensible environment for interactive and reproducible computing, based on the Jupyter Notebook Architecture. Prior to 4.5.7, JupyterLab's HTML sanitizer allowlists data-commandlinker-command and data-commandlinker-args on button elements, while CommandLinker listens for all click events on document.body and executes the named command without checking whether the element came from trusted JupyterLab UI. A notebook with a pre-saved HTML cell output containing a deceptive button can trigger arbitrary JupyterLab commands - including arbitrary code execution - on a single user click, without any code being submitted for execution by the user. This vulnerability is fixed in 4.5.7. | ||||
| CVE-2026-42266 | 1 Jupyter | 1 Jupyterlab | 2026-05-14 | 8.8 High |
| jupyterlab is an extensible environment for interactive and reproducible computing, based on the Jupyter Notebook Architecture. From 4.0.0 to 4.5.6, the allow-list of extensions that can be installed from PyPI Extension Manager (allowed_extensions_uris) is not correctly enforced by JupyterLab. The PyPI Extension Manager was not contained to packages listed on the default PyPI index. This vulnerability is fixed in 4.5.7. | ||||
| CVE-2026-45033 | 1 Github | 1 Copilot | 2026-05-14 | N/A |
| GitHub Copilot CLI brings AI-powered coding assistance directly to your command line. Prior to 1.0.43, a security vulnerability has been identified in GitHub Copilot CLI where a malicious bare git repository nested inside a project directory can achieve arbitrary code execution when the agent performs git operations. By exploiting git's automatic bare repository discovery during directory traversal, an attacker can set core.fsmonitor or other executable config keys to run arbitrary commands without user awareness or approval. The vulnerability arises because git's core.fsmonitor config key (and 15+ similar keys such as core.hookspath, diff.external, merge.tool, etc.) can specify arbitrary shell commands that git will execute as part of normal operations like status, diff, or rev-parse. This vulnerability is fixed in 1.0.43. | ||||
| CVE-2026-8496 | 1 Alinto | 1 Sogo | 2026-05-14 | 6.1 Medium |
| A cross-site scripting (XSS) vulnerability exists in Alinto SOGo, version 5.12.7. A maliciously crafted ICS calendar invitation files allows arbitrary JavaScript execution within the authenticated SOGo webmail session. The issue occurs because SVG content embedded in the description field of an ICS file, with an onrepeat event handler, is insufficiently sanitized before being rendered in the webmail interface. A remote attacker can execute JavaScript in the victim's browser when the malicious calendar invite is viewed. Successful exploitation may allow mailbox access, email and contact theft, session hijacking, and other actions allowed by an authenticated user. | ||||
| CVE-2026-44871 | 2 Arubanetworks, Hpe | 3 Arubaos, Sd-wan, Arubaos | 2026-05-14 | 7.2 High |
| Command injection vulnerabilities exist in the command line interface (CLI) service accessed by the PAPI protocol of AOS-8 and AOS-10 Operating Systems. Successful exploitation of these vulnerabilities could allow an authenticated remote attacker to execute arbitrary commands on the underlying operating system. | ||||
| CVE-2026-44347 | 2 Warp-tech, Warpgate Project | 2 Warpgate, Warpgate | 2026-05-14 | 5.8 Medium |
| Warpgate is an open source SSH, HTTPS and MySQL bastion host for Linux. Prior to 0.23.3, the SSO flow does not validate the state parameter, which makes it possible for an attacker to trick a user into logging into the attacker's account, possibly convincing them to perform sensitive actions on the attacker's account (such as writing sensitive data to the attacker's SSH target, or logging into an HTTP target that the attacker set up). This vulnerability is fixed in 0.23.3. | ||||
| CVE-2026-41105 | 1 Microsoft | 1 Azure Monitor Action Group Notification System | 2026-05-14 | 8.1 High |
| Server-side request forgery (ssrf) in Azure Notification Service allows an authorized attacker to elevate privileges over a network. | ||||
| CVE-2026-42891 | 1 Microsoft | 2 Edge, Edge Chromium | 2026-05-14 | 6.5 Medium |
| User interface (ui) misrepresentation of critical information in Microsoft Edge (Chromium-based) allows an unauthorized attacker to perform spoofing over a network. | ||||
| CVE-2026-42838 | 1 Microsoft | 1 Edge Chromium | 2026-05-14 | 5.4 Medium |
| Improper neutralization of special elements in output used by a downstream component ('injection') in Microsoft Edge (Chromium-based) allows an unauthorized attacker to elevate privileges over a network. | ||||
| CVE-2026-42833 | 1 Microsoft | 1 Dynamics 365 | 2026-05-14 | 9.1 Critical |
| Execution with unnecessary privileges in Microsoft Dynamics 365 (on-premises) allows an authorized attacker to execute code over a network. | ||||