Export limit exceeded: 10233 CVEs match your query. Please refine your search to export 10,000 CVEs or fewer.
Search
Search Results (10233 CVEs found)
| CVE | Vendors | Products | Updated | CVSS v3.1 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CVE-2016-1161 | 1 Zohocorp | 1 Password Manager Pro | 2025-04-20 | N/A |
| Cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in ManageEngine Password Manager Pro before 8.5 (Build 8500). | ||||
| CVE-2015-4593 | 1 Eclinicalworks | 1 Population Health | 2025-04-20 | N/A |
| eClinicalWorks Population Health (CCMR) suffers from a cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in portalUserService.jsp which allows remote attackers to hijack the authentication of content administrators for requests that could lead to the creation, modification and deletion of users, appointments and employees. | ||||
| CVE-2016-1261 | 1 Juniper | 1 Junos | 2025-04-20 | N/A |
| J-Web does not validate certain input that may lead to cross-site request forgery (CSRF) issues or cause a denial of J-Web service (DoS). | ||||
| CVE-2015-3655 | 1 Arubanetworks | 1 Clearpass | 2025-04-20 | 8.8 High |
| Cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Aruba Networks ClearPass Policy Manager before 6.4.7 and 6.5.x before 6.5.2 allows remote attackers to hijack the authentication of administrators by leveraging improper enforcement of the anti-CSRF token. | ||||
| CVE-2016-4907 | 1 Cybozu | 1 Garoon | 2025-04-20 | N/A |
| Cybozu Garoon 3.0.0 to 4.2.2 allow remote attackers to obtain CSRF tokens via unspecified vectors. | ||||
| CVE-2016-5789 | 1 Jantek | 2 Jtc-200, Jtc-200 Firmware | 2025-04-20 | N/A |
| A Cross-site Request Forgery issue was discovered in JanTek JTC-200, all versions. An attacker could perform actions with the same permissions as a victim user, provided the victim has an active session and is induced to trigger the malicious request. | ||||
| CVE-2016-5809 | 1 Schneider-electric | 6 Ion5000, Ion7300, Ion7500 and 3 more | 2025-04-20 | N/A |
| An issue was discovered on Schneider Electric IONXXXX series power meters ION73XX series, ION75XX series, ION76XX series, ION8650 series, ION8800 series, and PM5XXX series. There is no CSRF Token generated to authenticate the user during a session. Successful exploitation of this vulnerability can allow unauthorized configuration changes to be made and saved. | ||||
| CVE-2016-5937 | 1 Ibm | 1 Kenexa Lcms Premier | 2025-04-20 | N/A |
| IBM Kenexa LCMS Premier on Cloud is vulnerable to cross-site request forgery which could allow an attacker to execute malicious and unauthorized actions transmitted from a user that the website trusts. | ||||
| CVE-2016-6045 | 1 Ibm | 1 Tivoli Storage Manager | 2025-04-20 | N/A |
| IBM Tivoli Storage Manager Operations Center is vulnerable to cross-site request forgery which could allow an attacker to execute malicious and unauthorized actions transmitted from a user that the website trusts. | ||||
| CVE-2016-6103 | 1 Ibm | 1 Security Key Lifecycle Manager | 2025-04-20 | N/A |
| IBM Tivoli Key Lifecycle Manager 2.5 and 2.6 is vulnerable to cross-site request forgery which could allow an attacker to execute malicious and unauthorized actions transmitted from a user that the website trusts. | ||||
| CVE-2016-7980 | 1 Spip | 1 Spip | 2025-04-20 | N/A |
| Cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in ecrire/exec/valider_xml.php in SPIP 3.1.2 and earlier allows remote attackers to hijack the authentication of administrators for requests that execute the XML validator on a local file via a crafted valider_xml request. NOTE: this issue can be combined with CVE-2016-7998 to execute arbitrary PHP code. | ||||
| CVE-2016-8018 | 1 Mcafee | 1 Virusscan Enterprise | 2025-04-20 | N/A |
| Cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Intel Security VirusScan Enterprise Linux (VSEL) 2.0.3 (and earlier) allows authenticated remote attackers to execute unauthorized commands via a crafted user input. | ||||
| CVE-2016-8229 | 1 Lenovo | 1 Lenovo Service Bridge | 2025-04-20 | N/A |
| A cross-site request forgery vulnerability in Lenovo Service Bridge before version 4 could be exploited by an attacker with access to the DHCP server used by the system where LSB is installed. | ||||
| CVE-2016-8917 | 1 Ibm | 1 Sterling Selling And Fulfillment Foundation | 2025-04-20 | N/A |
| IBM Sterling Order Management 9.2 - 9.5 is vulnerable to cross-site request forgery which could allow an attacker to execute malicious and unauthorized actions transmitted from a user that the website trusts. IBM Reference #: 2000943. | ||||
| CVE-2016-8941 | 1 Ibm | 2 Spectrum Control, Tivoli Storage Productivity Center | 2025-04-20 | N/A |
| IBM Tivoli Storage Productivity Center is vulnerable to cross-site request forgery which could allow an attacker to execute malicious and unauthorized actions transmitted from a user that the website trusts. | ||||
| CVE-2016-9092 | 1 Symantec | 2 Content Analysis, Mail Threat Defense | 2025-04-20 | N/A |
| The Symantec Content Analysis (CA) 1.3, 2.x prior to 2.2.1.1, and Mail Threat Defense (MTD) 1.1 management consoles are susceptible to a cross-site request forging (CSRF) vulnerability. A remote attacker can use phishing or other social engineering techniques to access the management console with the privileges of an authenticated administrator user. | ||||
| CVE-2017-2273 | 1 Buffalo | 4 Wmr-433, Wmr-433 Firmware, Wmr-433w and 1 more | 2025-04-20 | N/A |
| Cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in WMR-433 firmware Ver.1.02 and earlier, WMR-433W firmware Ver.1.40 and earlier allows remote attackers to hijack the authentication of administrators via unspecified vectors. | ||||
| CVE-2017-1000008 | 1 Chyrp-lite Project | 1 Chyrp Lite | 2025-04-20 | N/A |
| Chyrp Lite version 2016.04 is vulnerable to a CSRF in the user settings function allowing attackers to hijack the authentication of logged in users to modify account information, including their password. | ||||
| CVE-2017-1000085 | 2 Jenkins, Redhat | 2 Subversion, Openshift | 2025-04-20 | N/A |
| Subversion Plugin connects to a user-specified Subversion repository as part of form validation (e.g. to retrieve a list of tags). This functionality improperly checked permissions, allowing any user with Item/Build permission (but not Item/Configure) to connect to any web server or Subversion server and send credentials with a known ID, thereby possibly capturing them. Additionally, this functionality did not require POST requests be used, thereby allowing the above to be performed without direct access to Jenkins via Cross-Site Request Forgery attacks. | ||||
| CVE-2017-1000090 | 1 Jenkins | 1 Role-based Authorization Strategy | 2025-04-20 | N/A |
| Role-based Authorization Strategy Plugin was not requiring requests to its API be sent via POST, thereby opening itself to Cross-Site Request Forgery attacks. This allowed attackers to add administrator role to any user, or to remove the authorization configuration, preventing legitimate access to Jenkins. | ||||