Export limit exceeded: 361170 CVEs match your query. Please refine your search to export 10,000 CVEs or fewer.
Export limit exceeded: 12489 CVEs match your query. Please refine your search to export 10,000 CVEs or fewer.
Export limit exceeded: 11864 CVEs match your query. Please refine your search to export 10,000 CVEs or fewer.
Search
Search Results (11864 CVEs found)
| CVE | Vendors | Products | Updated | CVSS v3.1 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CVE-2021-46921 | 1 Linux | 1 Linux Kernel | 2025-05-04 | 5.5 Medium |
| In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: locking/qrwlock: Fix ordering in queued_write_lock_slowpath() While this code is executed with the wait_lock held, a reader can acquire the lock without holding wait_lock. The writer side loops checking the value with the atomic_cond_read_acquire(), but only truly acquires the lock when the compare-and-exchange is completed successfully which isn’t ordered. This exposes the window between the acquire and the cmpxchg to an A-B-A problem which allows reads following the lock acquisition to observe values speculatively before the write lock is truly acquired. We've seen a problem in epoll where the reader does a xchg while holding the read lock, but the writer can see a value change out from under it. Writer | Reader -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- ep_scan_ready_list() | |- write_lock_irq() | |- queued_write_lock_slowpath() | |- atomic_cond_read_acquire() | | read_lock_irqsave(&ep->lock, flags); --> (observes value before unlock) | chain_epi_lockless() | | epi->next = xchg(&ep->ovflist, epi); | | read_unlock_irqrestore(&ep->lock, flags); | | | atomic_cmpxchg_relaxed() | |-- READ_ONCE(ep->ovflist); | A core can order the read of the ovflist ahead of the atomic_cmpxchg_relaxed(). Switching the cmpxchg to use acquire semantics addresses this issue at which point the atomic_cond_read can be switched to use relaxed semantics. [peterz: use try_cmpxchg()] | ||||
| CVE-2024-20692 | 1 Microsoft | 14 Windows 10 1507, Windows 10 1607, Windows 10 1809 and 11 more | 2025-05-03 | 5.7 Medium |
| Microsoft Local Security Authority Subsystem Service Information Disclosure Vulnerability | ||||
| CVE-2024-21423 | 1 Microsoft | 1 Edge Chromium | 2025-05-03 | 4.8 Medium |
| Microsoft Edge (Chromium-based) Information Disclosure Vulnerability | ||||
| CVE-2024-26162 | 1 Microsoft | 14 Windows 10 1507, Windows 10 1607, Windows 10 1809 and 11 more | 2025-05-03 | 8.8 High |
| Microsoft ODBC Driver Remote Code Execution Vulnerability | ||||
| CVE-2024-26163 | 1 Microsoft | 1 Edge Chromium | 2025-05-03 | 4.7 Medium |
| Microsoft Edge (Chromium-based) Security Feature Bypass Vulnerability | ||||
| CVE-2024-28903 | 1 Microsoft | 13 Windows 10 1507, Windows 10 1607, Windows 10 1809 and 10 more | 2025-05-03 | 6.7 Medium |
| Secure Boot Security Feature Bypass Vulnerability | ||||
| CVE-2024-28919 | 1 Microsoft | 13 Windows 10 1507, Windows 10 1607, Windows 10 1809 and 10 more | 2025-05-03 | 6.7 Medium |
| Secure Boot Security Feature Bypass Vulnerability | ||||
| CVE-2024-28921 | 1 Microsoft | 13 Windows 10 1507, Windows 10 1607, Windows 10 1809 and 10 more | 2025-05-03 | 6.7 Medium |
| Secure Boot Security Feature Bypass Vulnerability | ||||
| CVE-2024-28920 | 1 Microsoft | 9 Windows 10 1809, Windows 10 21h2, Windows 10 22h2 and 6 more | 2025-05-03 | 7.8 High |
| Secure Boot Security Feature Bypass Vulnerability | ||||
| CVE-2024-26250 | 1 Microsoft | 13 Windows 10 1507, Windows 10 1607, Windows 10 1809 and 10 more | 2025-05-03 | 6.7 Medium |
| Secure Boot Security Feature Bypass Vulnerability | ||||
| CVE-2024-20665 | 1 Microsoft | 13 Windows 10 1507, Windows 10 1607, Windows 10 1809 and 10 more | 2025-05-03 | 6.1 Medium |
| BitLocker Security Feature Bypass Vulnerability | ||||
| CVE-2024-20669 | 1 Microsoft | 13 Windows 10 1507, Windows 10 1607, Windows 10 1809 and 10 more | 2025-05-03 | 6.7 Medium |
| Secure Boot Security Feature Bypass Vulnerability | ||||
| CVE-2024-30043 | 1 Microsoft | 1 Sharepoint Server | 2025-05-03 | 6.5 Medium |
| Microsoft SharePoint Server Information Disclosure Vulnerability | ||||
| CVE-2024-30041 | 1 Microsoft | 1 Bing Search | 2025-05-03 | 5.4 Medium |
| Microsoft Bing Search Spoofing Vulnerability | ||||
| CVE-2024-30050 | 1 Microsoft | 14 Windows 10 1507, Windows 10 1607, Windows 10 1809 and 11 more | 2025-05-03 | 5.4 Medium |
| Windows Mark of the Web Security Feature Bypass Vulnerability | ||||
| CVE-2022-43985 | 1 Apache | 1 Airflow | 2025-05-02 | 6.1 Medium |
| In Apache Airflow versions prior to 2.4.2, there was an open redirect in the webserver's `/confirm` endpoint. | ||||
| CVE-2022-40230 | 1 Ibm | 1 Mq Appliance | 2025-05-02 | 6.5 Medium |
| "IBM MQ Appliance 9.2 CD, 9.2 LTS, 9.3 CD, and LTS 9.3 does not invalidate session after logout which could allow an authenticated user to impersonate another user on the system. IBM X-Force ID: 235532." | ||||
| CVE-2022-37911 | 1 Arubanetworks | 2 Arubaos, Sd-wan | 2025-05-02 | 3.8 Low |
| Due to improper restrictions on XML entities multiple vulnerabilities exist in the command line interface of ArubaOS. A successful exploit could allow an authenticated attacker to retrieve files from the local system or cause the application to consume system resources, resulting in a denial of service condition. | ||||
| CVE-2022-32609 | 2 Google, Mediatek | 32 Android, Mt6762, Mt6768 and 29 more | 2025-05-02 | 6.4 Medium |
| In vcu, there is a possible use after free due to a race condition. This could lead to local escalation of privilege with System execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation. Patch ID: ALPS07203410; Issue ID: ALPS07203410. | ||||
| CVE-2022-28763 | 1 Zoom | 3 Meetings, Rooms For Conference Rooms, Virtual Desktop Infrastructure | 2025-05-02 | 8.8 High |
| The Zoom Client for Meetings (for Android, iOS, Linux, macOS, and Windows) before version 5.12.2 is susceptible to a URL parsing vulnerability. If a malicious Zoom meeting URL is opened, the malicious link may direct the user to connect to an arbitrary network address, leading to additional attacks including session takeovers. | ||||