Export limit exceeded: 361611 CVEs match your query. Please refine your search to export 10,000 CVEs or fewer.
Search
Search Results (361611 CVEs found)
| CVE | Vendors | Products | Updated | CVSS v3.1 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CVE-2026-9267 | 2026-06-29 | N/A | ||
| Eclipse tinydtls before commit b3efd41ad111a4920f599f51ffa4f5e9f1e72221 contains an out-of-bounds read vulnerability in the check_server_certificate() function that allows unauthenticated attackers to trigger reads beyond valid buffer boundaries by crafting a Certificate handshake message with a specific fragment_length value. Attackers can exploit missing buffer length validation before uint24 reads, memcmp, and memcpy operations during DTLS epoch 0 on both client and server paths to cause denial of service on memory-constrained devices. | ||||
| CVE-2026-2587 | 1 Eclipse | 1 Glassfish | 2026-06-29 | 9.6 Critical |
| A critical Remote Code Execution (RCE) vulnerability was identified in the server-side template rendering mechanism used by the Glassfish gadget handler. The application processes .xml files and evaluates user-supplied values within a context where Expression Language (EL) “expressions” are processed without proper sanitization or escaping. By injecting expressions such as #{7*7}, the server returns 49, confirming server-side EL evaluation. This issue allows a remote attacker to fully compromise the underlying host, enabling capabilities as reading/modifying data, executing arbitrary commands, persistence, and lateral movement. This issue affects Eclipse GlassFish: from 8.0.0 to 8.0.1, fixed in 8.0.2; 7.1.0, fixed in 7.1.1; from 7.0.0 to 7.0.25, fixed in 7.0.26. Impact on versions from 5.1.0 to 6.2.5 is unknown. | ||||
| CVE-2026-2586 | 1 Eclipse | 1 Glassfish | 2026-06-29 | 9.1 Critical |
| An authenticated Remote Code Execution (RCE) vulnerability was identified in GlassFish's Administration Console. A user with access to the panel can send crafted requests that allow the execution of arbitrary operating system commands with the privileges of the application service user. This issue affects Eclipse GlassFish: from 8.0.0 to 8.0.1, fixed in 8.0.2; 7.1.0, fixed in 7.1.1; from 7.0.0 to 7.0.25, fixed in 7.0.26. Impact on versions from 5.1.0 to 6.2.5 is unknown. | ||||
| CVE-2026-13551 | 1 Itsourcecode | 1 Baptism Information Management System | 2026-06-29 | 7.3 High |
| A security vulnerability has been detected in itsourcecode Baptism Information Management System 1.0. This affects an unknown function of the file /editBaptism.php. Such manipulation of the argument ID leads to sql injection. The attack may be performed from remote. The exploit has been disclosed publicly and may be used. | ||||
| CVE-2026-10083 | 2026-06-29 | N/A | ||
| The APCu Manager WordPress plugin before 4.5.0 does not escape APCu object-cache keys before rendering them in an admin-area page, leading to a Stored Cross-Site Scripting vulnerability. When a persistent object cache is enabled, cache keys derived from unsanitised user input (e.g. a transient name created by another APCu Manager WordPress plugin before 4.5.0 from an unauthenticated request) are output without escaping and execute arbitrary JavaScript in the session of an administrator viewing the page. | ||||
| CVE-2026-57676 | 2026-06-29 | 4.3 Medium | ||
| Authorization Bypass Through User-Controlled Key vulnerability in Matteo Manna Simple User Avatar allows Exploiting Incorrectly Configured Access Control Security Levels. This issue affects Simple User Avatar: from n/a through 4.9. | ||||
| CVE-2026-13550 | 1 Itsourcecode | 1 Baptism Information Management System | 2026-06-29 | 7.3 High |
| A weakness has been identified in itsourcecode Baptism Information Management System 1.0. The impacted element is an unknown function of the file /delbaptism.php. This manipulation of the argument ID causes sql injection. The attack is possible to be carried out remotely. The exploit has been made available to the public and could be used for attacks. | ||||
| CVE-2026-57966 | 1 Redhat | 1 Enterprise Linux | 2026-06-29 | 4.4 Medium |
| A path traversal vulnerability was found in spice-vdagent. This flaw allows a malicious or compromised SPICE host to write arbitrary files to any location on the guest operating system. This occurs because the filename provided by the SPICE host during file transfers is not properly sanitized before being used. An attacker could exploit this to write to sensitive locations with the privileges of the spice-vdagent process, typically the logged-in user. This issue requires the SPICE host to be untrusted or compromised for exploitation. | ||||
| CVE-2026-57965 | 1 Redhat | 1 Enterprise Linux | 2026-06-29 | 5.1 Medium |
| A flaw was found in spice-vdagent. A malicious or compromised SPICE host can trigger an integer overflow by sending a specially crafted message. This vulnerability can lead to a heap buffer overflow, causing the spice-vdagent daemon to crash and resulting in a Denial of Service (DoS) for the virtual machine. This issue requires the SPICE host to be untrusted or compromised for exploitation. | ||||
| CVE-2026-13595 | 1 Redhat | 3 Enterprise Linux, Hummingbird, Openshift | 2026-06-29 | 6.8 Medium |
| A flaw was found in the libblkid library of util-linux. During nested partition probing, the BSD, Minix, Solaris x86, and UnixWare partition probers cache a raw pointer to a parent partition entry in a dynamically allocated array. When subsequent partition additions cause the array to be reallocated, this pointer becomes stale, leading to a heap use-after-free read. An attacker who can present a crafted block device image (for example, via USB insertion or a loop-mounted disk image) can trigger this flaw without user interaction, as libblkid is invoked automatically by udev/udisks as root on block-device hot-plug events. This could lead to limited information disclosure or denial of service. | ||||
| CVE-2026-22078 | 2026-06-29 | 7.3 High | ||
| Because O+ Connect's IPC service does not authenticate clients, external applications can escalate privileges and perform sensitive actions through the IPC channel. | ||||
| CVE-2026-42015 | 1 Redhat | 13 Discovery, Enterprise Linux, Enterprise Linux Eus and 10 more | 2026-06-29 | 5.3 Medium |
| A flaw was found in gnutls. An off-by-one error exists in the PKCS#12 bag element bounds check. This vulnerability allows an remote attacker to write past the internal array of a PKCS#12 bag when appending to a bag that already contains 32 elements. This memory corruption could lead to a denial of service (DoS) or potentially other unspecified impacts. | ||||
| CVE-2026-42014 | 2 Gnu, Redhat | 14 Gnutls, Discovery, Enterprise Linux and 11 more | 2026-06-29 | 6.6 Medium |
| A flaw was found in GnuTLS. The `gnutls_pkcs11_token_set_pin` function, used for changing the Security Officer PIN, can lead to a use-after-free vulnerability. This occurs when an attacker attempts to change the PIN with a NULL old PIN for a token that lacks a protected authentication path. | ||||
| CVE-2026-42013 | 2 Gnu, Redhat | 14 Gnutls, Discovery, Enterprise Linux and 11 more | 2026-06-29 | 8.2 High |
| A flaw was found in gnutls. When validating certificates, an oversized Subject Alternative Name (SAN) could cause the validation process to incorrectly fall back to checking the Common Name (CN) field. This could allow a remote attacker to bypass proper certificate validation, potentially leading to spoofing or man-in-the-middle attacks. | ||||
| CVE-2026-42012 | 2 Gnu, Redhat | 14 Gnutls, Discovery, Enterprise Linux and 11 more | 2026-06-29 | 7.1 High |
| A flaw was found in gnutls. A remote attacker could exploit this vulnerability by presenting a specially crafted certificate that contains Uniform Resource Identifier (URI) or Service (SRV) Subject Alternative Names (SANs). This could cause the certificate validation process to incorrectly fall back to checking DNS hostnames against the Common Name (CN), potentially allowing the attacker to spoof legitimate services or intercept sensitive information. | ||||
| CVE-2026-42011 | 1 Redhat | 13 Discovery, Enterprise Linux, Enterprise Linux Eus and 10 more | 2026-06-29 | 7.4 High |
| A flaw was found in gnutls. This vulnerability occurs because permitted name constraints were incorrectly ignored when previous Certificate Authorities (CAs) only had excluded name constraints. A remote attacker could exploit this to bypass critical name constraint checks during certificate validation. This bypass could lead to the acceptance of invalid certificates, potentially enabling spoofing or man-in-the-middle attacks against affected systems. | ||||
| CVE-2026-5260 | 2 Gnu, Redhat | 14 Gnutls, Discovery, Enterprise Linux and 11 more | 2026-06-29 | 8.2 High |
| A flaw was found in libgnutls. A remote attacker, by sending an extremely short premaster secret during an RSA key exchange to a server using an RSA key backed by a PKCS#11 token, could trigger a short heap overread. This memory corruption vulnerability could lead to information disclosure. | ||||
| CVE-2026-3833 | 2 Gnu, Redhat | 14 Gnutls, Discovery, Enterprise Linux and 11 more | 2026-06-29 | 6.5 Medium |
| A flaw was found in gnutls. This vulnerability occurs because gnutls performs case-sensitive comparisons of `nameConstraints` labels, specifically for `dNSName` (DNS) or `rfc822Name` (email) constraints within `excludedSubtrees` or `permittedSubtrees`. A remote attacker can exploit this by crafting a leaf certificate with casing differences in the Subject Alternative Name (SAN), leading to a policy bypass where a certificate that should be rejected is instead accepted. This could result in unauthorized access or information disclosure. | ||||
| CVE-2025-14831 | 2 Red Hat, Redhat | 18 Enterprise Linux, Ai Inference Server, Ceph Storage and 15 more | 2026-06-29 | 5.3 Medium |
| A flaw was found in GnuTLS. This vulnerability allows a denial of service (DoS) by excessive CPU (Central Processing Unit) and memory consumption via specially crafted malicious certificates containing a large number of name constraints and subject alternative names (SANs). | ||||
| CVE-2024-12133 | 1 Redhat | 8 Discovery, Enterprise Linux, Openshift and 5 more | 2026-06-29 | 5.3 Medium |
| A flaw in libtasn1 causes inefficient handling of specific certificate data. When processing a large number of elements in a certificate, libtasn1 takes much longer than expected, which can slow down or even crash the system. This flaw allows an attacker to send a specially crafted certificate, causing a denial of service attack. | ||||