Export limit exceeded: 350871 CVEs match your query. Please refine your search to export 10,000 CVEs or fewer.

Search

Search Results (350871 CVEs found)

CVE Vendors Products Updated CVSS v3.1
CVE-2025-12034 1 Wordpress 1 Wordpress 2026-04-15 4.4 Medium
The Fast Velocity Minify plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Stored Cross-Site Scripting via admin settings in all versions up to, and including, 3.5.1 due to insufficient input sanitization and output escaping. This makes it possible for authenticated attackers, with administrator-level permissions and above, to inject arbitrary web scripts in pages that will execute whenever a user accesses an injected page. This only affects multi-site installations and installations where unfiltered_html has been disabled.
CVE-2025-12503 1 Digiwin 1 Easyflow .net 2026-04-15 6.5 Medium
EasyFlow .NET and EasyFlow AiNet developed by Digiwin has a SQL Injection vulnerability, allowing authenticated remote attackers to inject arbitrary SQL commands to read database contents.
CVE-2025-1204 2026-04-15 N/A
The "update" binary in the firmware of the affected product sends attempts to mount to a hard-coded, routable IP address, bypassing existing device network settings to do so. The function triggers if the 'C' button is pressed at a specific time during the boot process. If an attacker is able to control or impersonate this IP address, they could upload and overwrite files on the device.
CVE-2025-12041 2 Apos37, Wordpress 2 Eri File Library, Wordpress 2026-04-15 5.3 Medium
The ERI File Library plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to unauthorized access of data due to a missing capability check on the 'erifl_file' AJAX action in all versions up to, and including, 1.1.0. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to download files restricted to specific user roles.
CVE-2025-12045 2 Themeisle, Wordpress 2 Orbit Fox, Wordpress 2026-04-15 6.4 Medium
The Orbit Fox: Duplicate Page, Menu Icons, SVG Support, Cookie Notice, Custom Fonts & More plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Stored Cross-Site Scripting via the category and tag 'name' parameters in all versions up to, and including, 3.0.2 due to insufficient input sanitization and output escaping. This makes it possible for authenticated attackers, with Author-level access and above, to inject arbitrary web scripts in pages that will execute whenever a user accesses an injected page.
CVE-2025-12046 1 Lenovo 2 App Store, Browser 2026-04-15 7.8 High
A DLL hijacking vulnerability was reported in the Lenovo App Store and Lenovo Browser applications that could allow a local authenticated user to execute code with elevated privileges under certain conditions.
CVE-2025-12047 1 Lenovo 1 Scanner Pro 2026-04-15 5.3 Medium
A vulnerability was reported in the Lenovo Scanner pro application during an internal security assessment that, under certain circumstances, could allow an attacker on the same logical network to disclose sensitive user files from the application.
CVE-2025-12048 1 Lenovo 1 Scanner Pro 2026-04-15 7.5 High
An arbitrary file upload vulnerability was reported in the Lenovo Scanner Pro client during an internal security assessment that could allow remote code execution or unauthorized control of the affected system.
CVE-2025-12050 1 Insyde 1 Insydeh2o 2026-04-15 7.8 High
The drivers in the tool packages use RTL_QUERY_REGISTRY_DIRECT flag to read a registry value to which an untrusted user-mode application may be able to cause a buffer overflow.
CVE-2025-12051 1 Insyde 1 Insydeh2o 2026-04-15 7.8 High
The drivers in the tool packages use RTL_QUERY_REGISTRY_DIRECT flag to read a registry value to which an untrusted user-mode application may be able to cause a buffer overflow.
CVE-2025-12052 1 Insyde 1 Insydeh2o 2026-04-15 7.8 High
The drivers in the tool packages use RTL_QUERY_REGISTRY_DIRECT flag to read a registry value to which an untrusted user-mode application may be able to cause a buffer overflow.
CVE-2025-12053 1 Insyde 1 Insydeh2o 2026-04-15 7.8 High
The drivers in the tool packages use RTL_QUERY_REGISTRY_DIRECT flag to read a registry value to which an untrusted user-mode application may be able to cause a buffer overflow.
CVE-2025-12055 2 Microsoft, Mpdv Mikrolab 4 Windows, Fedra 2, Hydra X and 1 more 2026-04-15 7.5 High
HYDRA X, MIP 2 and FEDRA 2 of MPDV Mikrolab GmbH suffer from an unauthenticated local file disclosure vulnerability in all releases until Maintenance Pack 36 with Servicepack 8 (week 36/2025), which allows an attacker to read arbitrary files from the Windows operating system. The "Filename" parameter of the public $SCHEMAS$ ressource is vulnerable and can be exploited easily.
CVE-2025-12056 1 Shelly 1 Pro 3em 2026-04-15 N/A
Out-of-bounds Read in Shelly Pro 3EM (before v1.4.4) allows Overread Buffers.
CVE-2025-12057 1 Wordpress 1 Wordpress 2026-04-15 9.8 Critical
The WavePlayer WordPress plugin before 3.8.0 does not have authorization in an AJAX action as well as does not validate the file to be copied locally, allowing unauthenticated users to upload arbitrary file on the server and lead to RCE
CVE-2025-12058 1 Keras 1 Keras 2026-04-15 5.5 Medium
The Keras.Model.load_model method, including when executed with the intended security mitigation safe_mode=True, is vulnerable to arbitrary local file loading and Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF). This vulnerability stems from the way the StringLookup layer is handled during model loading from a specially crafted .keras archive. The constructor for the StringLookup layer accepts a vocabulary argument that can specify a local file path or a remote file path. * Arbitrary Local File Read: An attacker can create a malicious .keras file that embeds a local path in the StringLookup layer's configuration. When the model is loaded, Keras will attempt to read the content of the specified local file and incorporate it into the model state (e.g., retrievable via get_vocabulary()), allowing an attacker to read arbitrary local files on the hosting system. * Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF): Keras utilizes tf.io.gfile for file operations. Since tf.io.gfile supports remote filesystem handlers (such as GCS and HDFS) and HTTP/HTTPS protocols, the same mechanism can be leveraged to fetch content from arbitrary network endpoints on the server's behalf, resulting in an SSRF condition. The security issue is that the feature allowing external path loading was not properly restricted by the safe_mode=True flag, which was intended to prevent such unintended data access.
CVE-2025-12059 1 Logo Software Industry And Trade Inc. 1 Logo J-platform 2026-04-15 9.8 Critical
Insertion of Sensitive Information into Externally-Accessible File or Directory vulnerability in Logo Software Industry and Trade Inc. Logo j-Platform allows Exploiting Incorrectly Configured Access Control Security Levels.This issue affects Logo j-Platform: from 3.29.6.4 before 3.34.8.9.
CVE-2025-12060 1 Keras 1 Keras 2026-04-15 8.3 High
The keras.utils.get_file API in Keras, when used with the extract=True option for tar archives, is vulnerable to a path traversal attack. The utility uses Python's tarfile.extractall function without the filter="data" feature. A remote attacker can craft a malicious tar archive containing special symlinks, which, when extracted, allows them to write arbitrary files to any location on the filesystem outside of the intended destination folder. This vulnerability is linked to the underlying Python tarfile weakness, identified as CVE-2025-4517. Note that upgrading Python to one of the versions that fix CVE-2025-4517 (e.g. Python 3.13.4) is not enough. One additionally needs to upgrade Keras to a version with the fix (Keras 3.12).
CVE-2025-12061 1 Wordpress 1 Wordpress 2026-04-15 8.6 High
The TAX SERVICE Electronic HDM WordPress plugin before 1.2.1 does not authorization and CSRF checks in an AJAX action, allowing unauthenticated users to import and execute arbitrary SQL statements
CVE-2025-1207 2026-04-15 3.1 Low
A vulnerability was found in phjounin TFTPD64 4.64. It has been declared as problematic. This vulnerability affects unknown code of the component DNS Handler. The manipulation leads to denial of service. The attack needs to be done within the local network. The complexity of an attack is rather high. The exploitation appears to be difficult. The exploit has been disclosed to the public and may be used.